Laparoscopic Partial Splenectomy Research Articles

Laparoscopic partial splenectomy for sclerosing angiomatoid nodular transformation: a case report and literature review

Abstract Laparoscopic partial splenectomy has become the preferred method for benign disease or low-graded malignancy with advantages of organ-preservation and avoidance of potential post-splenectomy fulminant infection. We herein presented a presumed diagnosis of sclerosing angiomatoid nodular transformation (SANT) subjected to laparoscopic partial splenectomy. The patient underwent the surgical procedure uneventfully and was discharged at day 4 postoperatively. The diagnosis was confirmed by the pathological examination.

Laparoscopic partial splenectomy in distal pancreatectomy may preserve splenic function.

Splenectomy is known to carry a risk of infection with encapsulated organisms and associated sepsis. Current Australian guidelines recommend intensive vaccination schedules and long-term antibiotic therapy. We postulate that in some clinical scenarios where distal pancreatectomy (DP) and splenectomy is being performed, a partial splenectomy is feasible. This may preserve splenic function and help retain immunocompetence. Five patients underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with partial splenectomy (LDPPS). The DP is performed with proximal division and resection of the splenic artery and vein. The inferior portion of the spleen is removed en bloc with the distal pancreas with ligasure and linear cutting staplers. The line of demarcation on the spleen after the division of the splenic artery identifies the portion supplied by the short gastric vessels. Temporary clamping of the short gastrics during splenic parenchymal transection reduces blood loss. All operations were completed laparoscopically and within 4 h. The pathology of resected lesions includes a serous cystadenoma, a pseudocyst, an IPMN and two small medial pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. The benign lesions involved splenic vessels at the hilum, making Kimura or Warshaw procedures untenable. No patient required blood transfusion. One patient suffered a postoperative collection consistent with postoperative pancreatic fistula requiring a drain for 10 days. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 24 months. Following surgery, all patients had a perfused splenic remnant on imaging and benign blood films, which suggests retained splenic function. Preserving some spleen when performing distal pancreatectomy may provide long-term benefits for patients.

Totally laparoscopic partial splenectomy and gastropexy for a splenic cyst in a wandering spleen.

With only seven reported cases until 2019 as noted by Lim et al., cases of a wandering spleen (WS) accompanied by splenic cyst (SC) are exceptionally rare. Furthermore, both entities are notoriously 'silent' until they present as an emergency with complications, often warranting total splenectomy. Management of SC in a WS eventually depends on its clinical presentation, disease type and functional reservoir of the spleen. However, it is desirable to operate electively and perform a spleen salvage with splenic reposition surgery. Our case describes the first totally laparoscopic partial splenectomy and intraperitoneal fixation of the spleen by means of gastropexy for a large non-parasitic SC in a WS. Partial splenectomy instead of just a cystectomy tackles the risk of cyst recurrence, and a gastropexy over other splenic repositioning techniques would allow the spleen to remain as an intraperitoneal organ.

Robotic-Assisted and Laparoscopic Splenectomy in Children: A Single Center Comparative Study.

Background: To explore the safety, efficacy, advantages, and disadvantages of robotic-assisted splenectomy (RS) in children by analyzing and comparing the clinical data of RS and laparoscopic splenectomy (LS). Methods: The clinical data of 35 children who underwent laparoscopic or RS or partial splenectomy from February 2010 to October 2022 were included. A retrospective analysis based on general information, clinical data, and prognosis were performed. Results: Among 35 cases, 14 cases, and 21 cases underwent RS and LS, respectively. The average operation time was 167 (120-224) minutes in the RS group and 176 (166-188) minutes in the LS group. The intraoperative blood loss was significantly larger in LS group than RS group (P = .0009). The length of hospital stay was significantly longer in LS group than RS group (P = .0015), and the hospitalization cost was significantly higher in RS group than LS group (P < .0001). There were no cases of conversion to laparotomy in the RS group, but two cases in the LS group. In terms of postoperative complications, there were one and three cases in the RS and LS groups, respectively. Conclusion: The Robotic Surgical System was safe and feasible in pediatric splenectomy or partial splenectomy which was an alternative to laparoscopic surgery.

Epidermoid Splenic Cyst in Children Treated by Laparoscopic Partial Splenectomy: Three Case Reports and Literature Review

Epidermoid Splenic Cyst in Children Treated by Laparoscopic Partial Splenectomy: Three Case Reports and Literature Review

Retrospective assessment of the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic partial splenectomy.

The present study aimed to explore the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic partial splenectomy in the treatment of benign lesions of the spleen and partial splenic rupture. The clinical value of laparoscopic partial splenectomies performed between March 2015 and May 2022 was retrospectively analyzed. Cases considered included the following: 14 spleen cysts, five spleen hemangiomas, one spleen hamartoma and two splenic ruptures. Lesion diameters of cases ranged from 5.0-11.3 cm. Results indicated that all 22 patients had an uneventful surgery, including 11 cases with lesions located in the upper pole of the spleen, nine in the lower pole of the spleen, one in the upper middle pole and one in the middle and lower pole. Operation time ranged from 75-180 min (mean: 120±17 min) and intraoperative bleeding ranged from 80-300 ml (mean: 178±70 ml). The average duration of postoperative hospitalization was 6±2 days, with all patients followed up for 10-12 months. Patients reported no symptoms of discomfort and had platelet levels within normal range. In conclusion, laparoscopic partial splenectomy allows for lesion resection while retaining normal splenic function and may be effectively used for treating benign spleen tumors and partial splenic rupture. However, the operation is difficult and surgeons must be able to perform minimally invasive techniques and strictly screen cases.

Bloodless Laparoscopic Partial Splenectomy Assisted by Bipolar Radiofrequency Excision Hemostatic Device.

Among the lymphatic system in the human body, the spleen is the most extensive one and has hematopoietic, hemofiltration, blood storage, and immune functions. As a new method of preserving the spleen, laparoscopic partial splenectomy (LPS) has been increasingly applied in clinical practice with people's deeper insights into minimally invasive treatment and the development of technical equipment. Compared with conventional open splenectomy, LPS can preserve normal spleen tissue as much as possible, decrease the occurrence of complications after total splenectomy, and reduce postoperative hospital stay. The bipolar radiofrequency excision hemostatic device used for LPS can solidify the splenic tissue and close the small blood vessels, which reduces the hemorrhage of the spleen cross-section and clears the operative field, thus achieving the ideal effect of "bloodless partial splenectomy". Therefore, under the premise of strictly mastering the indications and fully understanding the vascular anatomy of the spleen, the application of the bipolar radiofrequency excision hemostaticdevice in LPS is worthy of clinical promotion.

Laparoscopic management of benign splenic tumors in children

BackgroundThe splenic tumor is relatively rare in children. However, diagnosing and managing this disease remain controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and pathological features of benign splenic...

Large splenic epithelial cyst: A rare presentation.

Introduction and importanceSplenic cysts are infrequent and most of them are related to parasitic diseases. Splenic epithelial cyst (SEC) is the most common type of primary non-parasitic splenic cysts. Its pathogenesis is not yet clear. Splenic cysts are usually asymptomatic and are detected incidentally during imaging exams or an exploratory laparotomy.Case presentationOur case is about a primary SEC discovered incidentally. An 18-year-old male patient without any personal and family medical history, presented with symptoms of upper urinary tract infection. Renal ultrasound was performed and found incidentally a solitary cystic lesion in the spleen. A laparoscopic partial splenectomy was made then. The specimen was sent for pathological examination and a diagnosis of primary (epidermoid) epithelial splenic cyst was given.Clinical discussionSEC is a rare pathology that could mimic other splenic cysts like hydatid cyst. The preoperative diagnosis of SEC can be suspected by ultrasonography, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. However, histopathological examination is mandatory to confirm the diagnosis. A wide range of differential diagnoses is considered when we suspect clinically SEC because of its lower incidence.ConclusionActually, spleen-preserving surgery with minimally invasive methods such as laparoscopy is the gold standard for the treatment of SEC despite the risk of recurrence encountered with these techniques. However, different surgical modalities are discussed depending on the size and the location of the cyst and the patient's age.

Laparoscopic partial splenectomy for symptomatic benign cystic lesions: technical notes.

The purpose of this study was to explore the feasibility of laparoscopic partial splenectomy in patients with symptomatic benign lesions. During the period from April 2017 to February 2020, a single surgeon performed 7 LPS for benign lesions. As primary endpoint, we retrospectively analyzed the patient's short-term outcome and the operative results. As secondary endpoints, we considered 6-month follow-up. Laparoscopic partial splenectomy was performed successfully in all cases, with no major complications. Thirty-day mortality was nil. No post-operative transfusions were required and the median hospital stay was 4 (range 3-5) days. The median operative time was 110 (range 75-140) min and there was neither conversion to open surgery nor need for total splenectomy. Mean blood loss was 135.7 ± 103.6ml and no intraoperative blood transfusions were necessary. All patients recovered successfully, with significant decrease of Ca 19.9 (98.22 ± 118.10 U/mL vs. 4.78 ± 3.35 U/mL, P = 0.015) and normal platelet count (215.7 × 103 ± 42.2 × 103 per µL vs. 236.0 × 103 ± 58.3 × 103 per µL, P = 0.285) at 1-month follow-up. No cases of recurrence were detected during the 6-month follow-up. Laparoscopic splenic resection for benign lesions is a challenging but feasible procedure. This technique combines the advantages of both mini-invasive surgery and spleen preservation.

Clinical effect of laparoscopic partial splenectomy for both benign tumours and trauma-10 years of experience at a single institution.

This retrospective study aimed to present our surgical experience in patients with benign tumour or trauma in spleen who underwent laparoscopic partial splenectomy (LPS) and to compare the results with those of patients who underwent an open partial splenectomy (OPS). We analysed the medical data of patients who underwent LPS or OPS between January 2010 and January 2020. In total, 41 patients were enrolled. Nine patients underwent open surgery, 32 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery. The proportion of patients with tumours in the upper pole in LPS group was more than patients in OPS group. No difference was observed in estimated blood loss, allogeneic transfusion, postoperative stay, pathology and complications between LPS and OPS groups. The operation time in the LPS group (137.5 ± 30.8min) was longer than that in the OPS group (88.3 ± 30.1min) for patients with splenic traumatic rupture (P=0.019). LPS is an effective and safe spleen-preserving surgery as OPS. The advantages are small trauma, light pain and quick recovery. It is suitable for patients with benign tumours or trauma confined to one side of the spleen.

Minimally Invasive Partial Spleen Resection Preserving the Lower Pole in Children: A Technical Report on Feasibility and Safety.

Background: Laparoscopic partial splenectomy is a surgical option for removing part of the spleen with a pathological mass in a way that ensures preservation of the spleen's physiological functions. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of this procedure, performed while preserving the blood supply from the left gastroepiploic artery, in children. Materials and Methods: Following institutional review board approval, this retrospective study was conducted on patients who, between January 2015 and December 2019, underwent laparoscopic partial splenectomy with preservation of blood supply from the left gastroepiploic vessels. In the article, we described patient indications for surgery, surgical technique, surgery time, complications, and follow-up outcomes. Results: Eleven patients (mean age: 12.3 ± 3.4 years) underwent laparoscopic partial splenectomy. Indications for surgery included nonparasitic cysts (n = 8), pseudocysts (n = 2), and hamartomas (n = 1). The mean benign mass diameter was 60 ± 22 mm. The mean operative time was 193.2 ± 55.1 minutes. The mean size of the retained lower pole was 31.1% ± 3.8%. There was no conversion to open splenectomy or any significant complication. The mean postoperative stay was 9 ± 0.7 days. No thrombosis of the splenic and portal veins was noted in the follow-up period, and no splenic remnant infarction occurred. Conclusions: Laparoscopic partial splenectomy with preservation of blood supply arising from the left gastroepiploic vessels seems to be safe in children. However, a larger study is needed to confirm our results.

Effectiveness of Articulating Linear Stapler for Total and Partial Laparoscopic Splenectomy in Children.

Purpose: We performed a retrospective study to determine the effectiveness and feasibility of articulating linear stapler in laparoscopic total splenectomy (LTS) and laparoscopic partial splenectomy (LPS), focusing on technical laparoscopic skills that could help pediatric surgeons to avoid intra- and postoperative complications. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of children younger than 18 years who underwent laparoscopic spleen surgery between January 2008 and March 2020. Age, sex, indication for surgery, operative time (OT), intra- and postoperative complications, and postoperative length of hospital stay (LHS) were analyzed. Data from parenchymal resection and vessels sealing techniques were obtained. Results: Thirty patients, 19 LTS and 11 LPS, were included. The mean age of the patients was 10.9 years, and 16 patients were male and 14 were female. For hematologic diseases, LTS was the elective surgery, associated with cholecystectomy in 5 cases. LPS was the common procedure for splenic cysts. The stapler was used in LTS to close the hilum vessels and in LPS for parenchymal resection. No statistically significant differences in OT were observed comparing LTS and LPS. Two conversions occurred in LTS; none in LPS. The mean LHS was 6 days in both groups. No recurrence or major complications appeared in both groups at 1-12 years of follow-up. In particular for LPS, there are no relapse of cyst neither reduction in splenic function. Conclusions: This study shows the effectiveness, feasibility, and safety of mechanic stapler in splenic surgery both for hilum vessels sealing and for parenchymal resection. The use of this device can reduce risk of hemorrhagic recurrences or major surgical complications improving the safety of the operation.

Comparison of perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic and open partial splenectomy in children and adolescents.

BACKGROUNDIn order to avoid consequences of total splenectomy, partial splenectomy (PS) is increasingly reported. The purpose of this study was to compare perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic PS (LPS) and open PS (OPS) in children and adolescents.AIMTo compare perioperative outcomes of patients with LPS and OPS.METHODSAfter institutional review board approval, a total of 26 patients that underwent LPS or OPS between January 2008 and July 2018 were identified from the database of our tertiary referral center. In total, 10 patients had LPS, and 16 patients underwent OPS. Blood loss was calculated by Mercuriali’s formula. Pain scores, analgesic requirements and complications were assessed. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for comparison. To compare categorical variables, Fisher’s exact test was applied.RESULTSLPS was performed in 10 patients; 16 patients had OPS. Demographics (except for body mass index and duration of follow-up), indicating primary disease, preoperative spleen size and postoperative spleen volume, perioperative hematological parameters, postoperative pain scores, analgesic requirements, adverse events according to the Clavien-Dindo classification and the comprehensive complication index, median time from operation to initiation of feeds, median time from operation to full feeds, median time from operation to mobilization and median length of hospital stay did not differ between LPS and OPS. Median (range) operative time (min) was longer in LPS compared to the OPS group [185 (135-298) vs 144 (112-270), respectively; P = 0.048]. Calculated perioperative blood loss (mL of red blood cell count) was higher in the LPS group compared to OPS [87 (-45-777) vs -37 (-114-553), respectively; P = 0.039].CONCLUSIONThis is the first study that compared outcomes of LPS and OPS. Both operative approaches had comparable perioperative outcomes. LPS appears to be a viable alternative to OPS.

Splenectomy

Laparoscopic splenectomy has become an established standard of care in the management of surgical diseases of the spleen, except in the hemodynamically unstable trauma patient requiring splenectomy. Although adoption of minimally invasive splenectomy has led to a gradual decrease in the indications for open splenectomy, both procedures are still essential components of spleen surgery. This review describes the indications and contraindications for procedure, preoperative preparation and consent, operative anatomy and technique, and long-term follow-up. Tables review the clinical indications for splenectomy, classification of splenectomy, a comparison of laparoscopic versus open postsplenectomy outcomes, indications and contraindications for partial splenectomy, and reported incidences of postoperative outcomes and complications after splenectomy. Figures depict splenomegaly, the American Society of Hematology 2011 evidence-based practice guidelines for management of primary idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in children and adults, a splenic mass, a splenic cyst, massive splenomegaly, laparoscopic splenectomy, the 2014 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations for adult and pediatric splenectomy vaccination, splenic artery embolization, various laparoscopic approaches to splenectomy, splenic vascularization, division of splenic artery branches, suspensory ligaments of the spleen, laparoscopic exposure and transection of splenic hilum, retrieval bags and related procedures, open splenectomy, stapling, and laparoscopic partial splenectomy. Videos demonstrate purely laparoscopic splenectomy and hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy. This review contains 26 figures, 5 tables, 2 videos,  and 111 references.

Laparoscopic Partial Splenectomy: A Critical Appraisal of an Emerging Technique. A Review of the First 457 Published Cases.

Background: Laparoscopic partial splenectomy (LPS) may allow avoiding total splenectomy (TS) complications and maximizing the advantages of mini-invasive approach. The objective of this review is to assess feasibility and safety of LPS, to compare this approach with alternative options. Materials and Methods: A literature review of articles reporting LPS is performed. Several parameters, including age, indication, surgical technique, devices used for splenic section/hemostasis, adverse outcomes, including morbidity/mortality, conversions to open surgery, conversions to TS, operative time (OT), and hospital stay (HS), are analyzed. Articles comparing LPS' results with those of open partial splenectomy and laparoscopic TS are also analyzed. Results: Fifty-nine articles reporting 457 LPS were included. Patients' characteristics varied widely, concerning age and indications, including hematological disease (hereditary spherocytosis, drepanocytosis), splenic focal masses, and trauma. Several technical options are reported. Mean OT and HS are 128 ± 43.7 minutes and 4.9 ± 3.8 days, respectively. No mortality and 5.7% morbidity are reported. Conversion rates to open surgery and to TS are 3.9% and 3.7%, respectively. Conclusions: In conclusion LPS is feasible and safe, with no mortality, low morbidity, and low conversion rates to laparotomy and to TS. LPS may be accomplished by various techniques and tools. Major complications are sporadically reported, thus potential risks should not be underestimated.

Laparoscopic partial splenectomy for a splenic hamartoma

We discuss current knowledge and management of splenic hamartoma, an uncommon form of benign tumor. A splenic hamartoma is a rare form of benign splenic mass, often found incidentally while working up other complaints, and is typically treated by surgical resection of the mass. In this case, we discuss the management of an incidentally found splenic hamartoma that was treated with laparoscopic partial splenectomy. The patient presented in the Emergency Department complaining of periumbilical pain after having been struck in the abdomen with a soccer ball the previous day. Following a physical exam and blood work, an ultrasound was performed that revealed a hypoechoic area within the spleen. The patient received a diagnosis of gastroenteritis and an appointment for follow-up at 2 months. At 2-month follow-up, an ultrasound indicated that the mass had grown. The mass appeared consistent with a splenic hemangioma, so the patient was scheduled for laparoscopic partial splenectomy. The mass was completely resected without any complications. The patient had an uncomplicated postoperative course. When there are no other indications for a total splenectomy and malignancy is unlikely, laparoscopic partial splenectomy appears to be a reasonable treatment modality for a splenic hamartoma.

Laparoscopic Partial Splenectomy with Distal Pancreatectomy Preserves Splenic Function

Introduction: Distal Pancreatectomy often requires splenectomy, for oncologic reasons, or because splenic vessels are involved. The immune function of the spleen is increasingly recognized, and many national guidelines suggest long term antibiotics following splenectomy.

Laparoscopic Central Splenectomy for Littoral Cell Angioma

BackgroundSplenic littoral cell angioma (LCA) is a rare vascular tumor with malignant potential originating from the red pulp of the spleen.1,2 Although laparoscopic splenectomy is the treatment choice for LCA,3 patients suffer from long-term complications of sepsis, thrombosis, and tumor.4,5 Laparoscopic central splenectomy (LCS) for LCA is a technically challenging operation mainly due to the risk of intraoperative hemorrhage. However, it can be a valuable alternative particularly for adolescent patients in whom maximum preservation of splenic function outweighs the risks associated with organ preservation. MethodsA 15-year-old young man was admitted with left upper abdominal dull pain for 1 month. Laboratory tests and enhanced abdominal CT scans were performed. Laboratory test results were all normal, as follows: complete blood count showed normal WBC: 5.74 × 109/l, platelets: 173 × 109/l, Hb: 151 g/l, tumor markers (CEA: 1.62 ng/ml, CA19–9: 10.30 U/ml, AFP: 1.13 ng/ml) which were within normal limits. CT scan showed that a 5 × 5.9-cm solid tumor was discovered in the middle part of the spleen during diagnosis, and the density of this tumor was high in the early artery phase and low in the late portal venous phase of contrast-enhanced CT. LCS was performed where the trunk of the splenic artery was intermittently occluded and several branches of the vessels were freed from the tumor which was then resected. The splenic parenchyma was dissected by following a line 0.5 cm from demarcation line. The tumor was completely removed with the activity of the splenic parenchyma being preserved to the maximum extent. Total operation time was 175 min, with an estimated blood loss of 200 ml; thus, no blood transfusion was required. Intraoperative frozen section suggested vascular tumor-like lesions, and then the tumor was completely removed with the resection margin being free of tumor involvement. ResultsThe patient was fully recovered after a 7-day hospital stay. The reason for the 7-day hospital stay is that the patient maintains normal ambulating independent assistance on POD-3 and can eat without intravenous fluids on POD-4. Meanwhile, the patient needs to remove the drainage tube after the abdominal CT scan on POD-6, rather than postoperative complications. Diagnosis of LCA was confirmed using histology, and the symptoms disappearing after the operation was done. A total of 86·laparoscopic partial splenectomy (LPS) procedures were performed at the Department of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital and Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Minimal Invasive Surgery, Chengdu ShangJin NanFu Hospital from May 2011 to May 2020. Five patients among the total number of patients were diagnosed with LCA of which LPS was performed in four patients and LCS performed for one patient. The mean duration of surgery for LPS was 100 min (range of 80-120 min) while the mean estimated blood loss was 125 ml (range of 100-200 ml). On the other hand, the mean length of hospital stay was 7.5 days (range of 5-11 days) and the mean tumor diameter was 5.1 cm (range of 3.2-7 cm). All patients recovered without complications. In addition, there were no signs of immune insufficiency, thrombosis, and tumor recurrence during the follow-up which had a mean of 31.2 months (range from 10 to 53 months). ConclusionLCS is a technically feasible technique for a select group of patients with centrally located LCA. The technique helps to maximize preservation of splenic function and maintains the advantages of minimally invasive surgery.

Laparoscopic partial splenectomy for splenic lymphangioma: a case report

BackgroundLymphangioma is a benign malformation of the lymphatic system and is often found in the neck and axilla, the orbit, the mediastinum, etc. However, isolated splenic lymphangioma is a rare disease in young women, and its treatment is controversial. We report a case of laparoscopic partial splenectomy for isolated splenic lymphangioma in a young woman.Case presentationAn 18-year-old woman with mild epigastralgia was admitted to a nearby hospital. Abdominal ultrasound detected a 6-cm mass confined to the upper pole of the spleen; thereafter, she was referred to our department for surgical treatment. Although a benign tumor, we decided to resect it because of her symptoms. To preserve part of the normal spleen, laparoscopic partial splenectomy was performed with a co-axial approach using four ports and a liver retractor in the lithotomy position. After dissection around the spleen hilum, we identified that the tumor was being fed from the splenic vessels of the upper pole and severed the branch. Postoperatively, the patient showed no complications and was discharged on postoperative day 8 without symptoms. Pathological examination revealed splenic lymphangioma, which is rare in young women. No recurrence was seen 1 year after surgery, and a computed tomography scan showed no problems with the remaining spleen.ConclusionsIn our experience of laparoscopic partial splenectomy for a young woman with an isolated splenic lymphangioma, we determined that laparoscopic partial splenectomy is a safe, effective, and valuable option for the treatment of benign splenic tumors.